Everyone knows that change is challenging, and gaining support for any change initiative is the most challenging aspect. New software, organisational structures, or work styles are frequently the simplest in managing change. However, building support, directing behavioural changes, and increasing acceptance are the more challenging aspects of change.

People fight against being transformed, not against change itself.

When people are pushed to step outside of their comfort zones, change might evoke anxiety or discomfort. Additionally, it frequently necessitates incremental effort—time spent developing new knowledge, abilities, or strategies. This anxiety, uneasiness, or more work may cause a surge of resistance or scepticism toward the change and its benefits.

Given these difficulties, it can be beneficial to understand that individuals frequently oppose change for reasons related to its consequences rather than the changes themselves. For example, the following are some reasons why people resist change:

• People desire a clear path for the future. The general reasons for the change—the why—and how the adjustments complement the goal, and long-term mission can help people accept it more readily. In addition, people must comprehend the anticipated benefits of the change and why the effort will be worthwhile.
• People seek autonomy and control. People may think they are losing control over their work, alternatives, or performance as things change in the workplace. On the contrary, management at work is linked to increased productivity and better physical health. By restoring as much control as possible to the people, you can increase their acceptance of the change.

People want to maintain their integrity. Employees naturally are interested in the current situation, and many of them may have contributed to its development by deciding on or taking part in earlier implementations. By persuading people that the past is neither awful nor incorrect, you can increase the tolerance of changes.

• People desire safety. Humans need security and a reduction in dangers from a neurological perspective. By explaining the reasons for the change in business objectives and informing individuals as much as possible about the natural consequences of actions, you can lessen resistance to change.
• Most people desire competence. People can become offended by new systems because they fear their competency will be called into question. Assure people that they will have the time and assistance needed to improve their abilities and the freedom to try new things without suffering consequences.
• People yearn to be socially connected. They require a sense of community and wholesome working connections. Showing individuals how they may still connect, despite other transformations that may be taking place, would reassure them about the importance of relationships and collegiality.

The three categories of resistance to change include:

1. a) Logical resistance: This type of resistance primarily results from how long it takes for people to accept and adapt to changes. For instance, when computers became widely used, accountants had to transition from paper-based to digital accounting. So, naturally, getting used to this takes time.
2. b) Psychological resistance: In this group, resistance is only brought about by psychological and mental aspects. People frequently oppose change due to factors including aversion to management, intolerance for difference, fear of the unknown, etc.
3. c) Sociological resistance: This opposition focuses on collective norms and values rather than specific people. People might be open to change, but they won’t because of peer pressure from their group. For instance, if a workers’ union protests new management policies, all employees are under pressure to join the protest.

While resistance to change is virtually always present, it is possible to go through it. The goal of managers should be to support their staff as they adapt to changing situations and enable emerging functional variations. First and foremost, managers must be able to persuade staff members that the changes they are advocating are essential. They must demonstrate how these modifications will benefit both the employees and the company as a whole.

Second, to make changes smoothly, management might bear the following factors in mind:

• Changes should be implemented in stages because it is simpler than all at once.
• Changes shouldn’t ever compromise employees’ security.
• Managers must consider all employees whose opinions would be impacted by the proposed change.
• Employee resistance is reduced if managers first model leadership by undergoing adjustments.
• Employees who have received adequate training can confidently embrace changes.

Encouragement of staff participation is usually a smart move when management plans for improvements. Employees must participate in planning because the changes are intended for them. They will be less likely to oppose changes when they participate in them. For this, the management can arrange brief conferences or casual encounters with the staff. Managers should fully explain the planned adjustments. It’s essential to encourage employees to voice their opinions as well. All project work streams are affected by change management, and all stakeholder types are indirectly involved. While face-to-face meetings are impossible, there is now little opposition to virtual alternatives, which present obstacles and opportunities for a project’s approach to change management. By taking advantage of these chances, change management practices will advance.

Do you require some skills to facilitate the changes you are experiencing in your organisation? Enrol in ATAFOM University to conveniently acquire the needed skills to adapt to the changes around you. Change management is here to stay, and ATAFOM is here to help you through it.

ATAFOM UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL 

We are providing the required skills needed for effective change management.